Configure the 2019 Mac Pro for Video Editing [u]

Apr. 19, 2020, with more thoughts on AfterBurner, the new Radeon Pro W5700X GPU, and revised system recommendations.
Dec. 23, 2019, with more information about video compression.]

Like many of you, I’ve been reading many initial reviews of the new Mac Pro from Apple. And, like many of you, I’ve been wondering whether I should buy it and, if so, which version I should buy.

In thinking about this new system – a lot – I realized that, while my work doesn’t require a Mac Pro, I certainly WANT one! Let me share my thinking with you – feel free to add your opinions in the comments.


Apple deserves MAJOR congratulations for designing, building and releasing the new Mac Pro. Virtually every one of our power requests has been granted… except the standard consumer complaint that we always want everything to cost less.

Apple describes the 2019 Mac Pro as a system “with the greatest performance, expansion, and configurability yet, it is a system created to let a wide range of professionals push the limits of what is possible.

“Mac Pro is designed for pros who need the ultimate in CPU performance. From production rendering to playing hundreds of virtual instruments to simulating an iOS app on multiple devices at once, it’s exceedingly capable. At the heart of the system is an Intel Xeon processor with up to 28 cores — the most ever in a Mac. In addition, large L2 and shared L3 caches and 64 PCI Express lanes provide massive bandwidth in and out of the processor. (Apple website)


What is critically different from all other Mac systems available today is the degree we can customize this system AFTER we purchase it.

This means that we no longer need to decide, before we even start working with a unit, all the different hardware we MAY need in order to maximize its performance while protecting our investment for the future. With this new Mac Pro, as our needs evolve, we can add new gear into it.

This requires a big shift in how we think about purchasing an Apple system.


There are many reasonable use cases for the Mac Pro, may of which don’t involve media:

I’m sure you can think of others.

Another big one is bragging rights. If you have the money, buying a Mac Pro is a STATEMENT. Especially if you are running a creative shop, there is no questioning your ability to push the envelop when you invest in one or more Mac Pros for your creative team.

The short answer, though, and probably the best, is that if you can’t get your work done on time and on-budget with the gear you have, you need to consider the 2019 Mac Pro.

Yes, the press got a large laugh out of fully-configuring the Mac Pro and watching it top out over $50,000! I know that the first thing I did, when Apple released its pricing, was to see how much a fully-loaded system would cost.

But, that misses the point. Very, very few of us and no video editor I know of, would need a fully-loaded system. Rather, we need a system that’s optimized for the work we need to get done.

For film-makers, that allows us to leave out the most expensive options: excessive RAM, excessive SSD storage and excessive GPUs. Apple needed to provide these options to prevent all the nay-sayers from asking: “Is THAT all you did???” But simply because these options are available does not mean that the work we do needs them.

If you have the money – buy whatever you want! The Mac Pro is amazing and, if I had the money, I’d buy two!  Sales will encourage Apple to release more upgradeable systems. But when budgets intervene, we need to look at the best way to balance performance vs. cost.


Afterburner is a PCIe accelerator graphics card that offloads the decoding of ProRes and ProRes RAW video codecs in Final Cut Pro X, QuickTime Player X, and supported third-party applications.

If you are editing 4K or smaller media frame sizes, you won’t see enough increase in performance to justify spending $2,000 for a video-optimized graphics card. As frame sizes increase beyond 4K, the Afterburner card will help – but converting to a proxy workflow will achieve the same performance benefit without the additional cost.

NOTE: Keep in mind that Afterburner only accelerates ProRes files. If you are working with MXF, RED or other media, Afterburner won’t help – while adding another general purpose GPU to the Mac Pro will.

While it is very cool to say: “I edit 8K multicam video natively!” my first question would be “Why?” There are so many better ways to work with media files that size. On the other hand, Afterburner is designed for those edge cases that are working with 8K ProRes media in real-time for live productions. In which case, this card becomes essential.

UPDATE (4/19/20): Here’s a more detailed look at AfterBurner, which I wrote after writing this article.


Apple just released the Radeon Pro W5700X graphics card as an option for the 2019 Mac Pro.

The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X GPU comes in two options when customizing a Mac Pro: A single graphics card with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory for $600 USD, or a dual option for $1,000. If you’ve already purchased a new Mac Pro, and want to take advantage of the W5700X graphics card, Apple lists the single GPU option on their site for $1,000.

The 5700 is much more affordable than the Radeon Pro Vega II card which starts at $2,400.

According to Apple’s Mac Pro page, the 5700 has about 67% better performance than the base level 580X, 9.4 vs. 5.6 teraflops. While the 5700 has about 32% less performance than a single Vega II, 14.1 vs 9.6 teraflops, the 5700 costs about 75% less.

Both the 5700 and Vega II support the same number of ports, same number of external monitors (with the exception of the ProDisplay XDR, where the Vega supports one less than the 5700), and roughly the same power consumption.

If you know you need top of the line GPU power, go right to the Vega II. However, for most editors, based upon the specs provided by Apple, the W5700X provides an excellent value with solid performance that’s worth spending the extra dollars to get.


Unlike iMac and MacBook Pro systems, both the iMac Pro and Mac Pro use an Intel CPU that does not support hardware acceleration for H.264 and HEVC codecs. What I learned recently is that, while the iMac Pro and Mac Pro do not have the Intel Media Engine, they do include Apple’s T2 chip which features built-in, hardware-accelerated encoding of H.264 and 8-bit HEVC.

NOTE: 10-bit HEVC is still software encoded, and the faster your CPU, the faster the encode.


Unlike analyzing large data sets, or compiling programs measured in gigabytes, media editing is always stop and start. With any creative process, you need time to think. During those times when you’re thinking, the computer is calculating behind the scenes.

The 2019 Mac Pro is a monster machine, but we don’t need to fully load it to speed our work. And that’s an important point: The Mac Pro delivers speed, not higher quality.

Here are my thoughts:

NOTE: Here’s a tip on how to track memory use on a Mac.

These suggestions create a powerful system targeted at media editing for only $8,299 (US). While not cheap, this is a far cry from the initial reports of a $50,000 system. (And about $2,000 less than my original recommendation using a single Vega II card.)

While your needs may not match my suggestions, here’s my central point: the Mac Pro delivers high-performance in an expandable chassis. By thinking about what you need to get started, rather than where you may potentially end up, you can take advantage of the power the Mac Pro provides without breaking the bank.

After that, you can expand as your needs require.

Bookmark the permalink.

42 Responses to Configure the 2019 Mac Pro for Video Editing [u]

Newer Comments →
  1. Jin Vaughn says:

    What an excellent write-up.

    Thanks Larry.

  2. Great review Larry! I was just looking at the specs this morning for editing and rendering and licking my chops…, so thanks for the summary and critical points.

    Thanks again for the review and Happy Holidays

  3. dave Muehsam says:

    Thanks, Larry. Short and to the point.

  4. Your summary is covering all critical points so after that is to us to select a Mac Pro or an iMac Pro or a Loaded Standard iMac 27 inch 5k 2019 who answer our needs.

  5. Hi Larry just locked picture on my Feature film and I need a colour correcting monitor. The new apple monitor is really expensive and wondered if you could recommend an alternative monitor for HDR colour correcting my last kick at the can. I shot in 5.7k pro res raw with an EVA 1 camera.
    Thanks for being there…

    Best for the New Year

    Peter Hitchcock

    • Larry says:


      HDR monitors are NOT! cheap. The best sell for $15,000 – $22,000 – in comparison, Apple’s version is a bargain.

      For alternatives at low prices, check into monitors from Flanders Scientific. Or, see if you can rent Apple’s monitor from a rental house.


  6. Frank says:

    Hi Larry,

    Thanks for the great article!

    Happy Holidays!


  7. Dan Katz says:

    First off, thank you for continuing your work. I always value your communication skills and ability to break topics down in a simple and honest way. So, I am curious if you, or anyone here, had an opinion on a OWC’s 12-core upgrade for the 2013 Trashcan. I have the 6-core and it appears for roughly $2500 I could double my CPU/RAM and SSD. Geekbench scores appear to nearly double performance. I’m trying to assess whether it’s short-sighted to upgrade, when in a year, the new machine MAY be in budget. I understand I’d still missing out on next gen connectivity (Thunderbolt 3, etc), but the newest of the new is out of range for now. That also includes iMac Pro, which I have no plans to buy. Thanks for any insight.

  8. Eric says:

    I’m just about ready to pull the trigger on this machine, but am trying to hold off until they release the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X graphics card. The 580X is way too underpowered, but I feel like the Pro Vega II might be overkill. Any thoughts on the potential for the W5700X?

    • Larry says:


      First, until Apple releases it, we won’t actually what it can do.

      Second, you are buying a Mac Pro for performance. If you need to save money, buy an iMac Pro, or even an iMac. If performance is your goal, you should probably rethink the GPU. My sense is step up to the Vega II – at least the single card version.

      Remember, from the perspective of a video editor, faster GPUs are just that – faster. Regardless of which GPU you get, the image quality is the same.


  9. Andrew Wilson says:

    Thanks for the excellent advice. One bit I was hoping you would touch on… I would love to hear your opinion on external storage. I currently run a MacPro (the one that looks more like the 2019 one – not the black cylinder.

    I have a PCI-e SSD for by boot drive and the other 4 internal drive bays range from 4 to 8 TB spinning hard drives. Plus a DL BR-D for backing up camera media.

    So, in your opinion, what’s the best way to add massive amounts of fast external storage (fast enough for 4k video) to the 2019 MacPro?

  10. so, just under $11K for the system (not including external storage.) Reasonable…

    And for point of historical comparison, my first FCP 2 system (an early 2001 PowerMac G4 533) with 128 meg of RAM, and 150 gigabytes of FW400 storage, cost me around $6200.

    • Andrew Wilson says:

      Anyone else remember paying $60,000+ for a media composer? And $3,000 for their 9 gig drives?

      We’ve gotten very used to being able to do so much for so little.

Newer Comments →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Larry Recommends:

FCPX Complete

NEW & Updated!

Edit smarter with Larry’s latest training, all available in our store.

Access over 1,900 on-demand video editing courses. Become a member of our Video Training Library today!


Subscribe to Larry's FREE weekly newsletter and save 10%
on your first purchase.