Pick The Right Version of ProRes

Posted on by Sudd

Here’s a question I get almost every day: “I’m shooting [insert name of video format] what version of ProRes is best for my project.”

ProRes is an excellent codec for editing and finishing. It is 10-bit, which means it provides 1,024 shades of gray or shades of each color per pixel. It has a high bit-rate, which means it retains excellent image resolution. However, there are six versions of ProRes, each of which vary in bit rate (and file size). In order of bit rate and potentially image quality, these are:

Which one is best for your project? Based on my research, conversations and experience, here’s what I recommend.

NOTE: From an audio point of view, all six versions of ProRes have the same excellent, uncompressed audio quality.

PRORES PROXY

ProRes Proxy is designed for small file sizes and very efficient editing. It is not designed for great image quality. This is because it only displays every other pixel on every other row. (This is called “quarter-resolution.)

ProRes Proxy is the best choice for:

The only time I regularly use ProRes Proxy is multicam editing and I never output proxy files. I always output either optimized or camera native to get the best image quality possible.

Apple suggests using ProRes Proxy files for archiving. While Proxy files are smaller than any other ProRes format, they are still far larger than H.264. And, at the same bit rate, H.264 has higher image quality. I tend not to use ProRes Proxy for archiving.

PRORES 422 LT

ProRes 422 LT is a format that I don’t use at all. While it has good image quality because it includes every pixel in the image, I find it too hard to create, given how other ProRes options are integrated with Final Cut Pro X.

I definitely don’t recommend setting render files to ProRes LT. Higher bit rate versions are a much better choice.

If I were to archive a standard-definition video project, I’d consider this format. I probably wouldn’t use it, but it would be worth considering. Why consider it? Because ProRes 422 LT generates the smallest file size of all the high-quality ProRes formats.

PRORES 422

This is the default and workhorse video format for all optimized media in Final Cut Pro X. It is an excellent balance between image quality and editing efficiency.

ProRes 422 is the best choice for:

The trade-off for using ProRes 422 is that the files are large; about 1 GB per minute. However, when I’m editing, I want the best image quality with the fastest performance. I’ll compress the master file down into something small for distribution after all the editing is done.

PRORES 422 HQ

This is the best format to use when your camera actually records ProRes 422 HQ. File sizes are bigger, however, about 1.5 GB per minute.

The only difference between ProRes 422 and ProRes 422 HQ is the data rate. And, unless you are using really good lenses with really good lighting, you won’t see a difference between ProRes 422 and 422 HQ.

What you will see is that your hard disks are filling up faster than normal.

PRORES 4444

The difference between the 422 family and the 4444 family is how they deal with color. Image resolution is the same between the two. 422 color sampling creates one color value for every two pixels. 4444 color sampling provides a color sample for each pixel.

The reason you don’t need this higher-quality color sampling for video is that almost all video cameras use 422 color sampling, which means that you don’t improve your color by converting camera images to 4444; you just move it into a larger color space.

ProRes 4444 is the best choice for:

PRORES 4444 XQ

This is the newest member of the ProRes family. It is a very specialized, high-quality format that is designed for cameras more than post.

ProRes 4444 XQ is best for:

If your camera doesn’t shoot this format, converting your files into this format won’t get you anything.

Here’s an article I’ve written on this codec that explains things in more detail.

SUMMARY

In short, here’s what I recommend:

Following these guidelines can decrease your stress and your hard disk requirements, without damaging your image quality


Bookmark the permalink.

30 Responses to Pick The Right Version of ProRes

← Older Comments
  1. Simon Yates says:

    Larry,

    I shoot with a Canon SLR, which outputs H.264 in .mov container. If I choose to use pro res 422, should I convert them in compressor first and then import? What is the proper way to convert .mov files for editing?

    Thanks,
    Simon

    • Larry says:

      Simon:

      If you are using the footage for only one project, let FCP X convert it during import. If you plan to use it in multiple libraries, converting in Compressor before importing into FCP X will save you time.

      Larry

  2. Eric Goetz says:

    Great summary. I’ll add that if you’re working with an audio post-house or composer, they’ll often ask for a workprint of your locked picture in ProRes 422 LT format, since it’s lower bitrate than the other ProRes formats (and H.264 doesn’t easily support random access if they are scrolling around with a jog wheel).

  3. cjordan says:

    Best ProRes for Optimum Audio?

← Older Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Larry Recommends

Final Cut Pro X 10.4

FCPX Complete

Edit smarter with Larry’s brand-new webinars, all available in our store.

Access over 1,900 on-demand video editing courses. Become a member of our Video Training Library today!

JOIN NOW

Subscribe to Larry's FREE weekly newsletter and save 10%
on your first purchase.