An Exercise In Frustration

Posted on by Larry

[ This article was first published in the March, 2011, issue of
Larry’s Final Cut Pro Newsletter. Click here to subscribe. ]


For my policy on product reviews, please click here.

BACKGROUND NOTE: I’ve become increasingly concerned as I talk with producers, editors, and vendors that we are rapidly moving into a tapeless environment without any realistically priced options for long-term media archiving. So I wrote about this in my blog on March 14. This generated dozens of comments, a response from HP (published below), and lengthy phone calls from several vendors with information that I can’t disclose until NAB.


However, this issue is absolutely not resolved, so I’m sharing these with you here so that together, we can keep the pressure on the manufacturers until the situation gets resolved.

It shouldn’t be this difficult.

NOTE: This blog grew out of my webinar last week on how to archive Final Cut Pro projects. If you are interested in archiving, click here to learn more.

The process of creating films and videos generates LOTS of data. From getting the footage shot, through the editing process, we are dealing with dozens, if not hundreds, of gigabytes of data.

And we solve this problem by buying ever more and ever larger hard disks and RAIDS. So far, a trifle expensive, but not really a problem.

However, once a project is done, we can’t just throw all these files away. The images and interviews are irreplaceable and have a value long after a project is complete.

We need to save these for the long-term, a process called “archiving.” And here, we are caught between a rock and a hard place.

In the camera industry’s head-long rush to convert to cameras that shoot tapeless video, they seem to have overlooked the fact that we need to save these video files after editing is complete.

I have spoken with executives at Sony, Canon, JVC, Panasonic, and the rest of the camera industry, not one offers any kind of long-term archiving solution.

NOTE: I define archiving as the ability to save all video project and source files for a period of 10 – 25 years. Backup is what we do to protect ourselves during a project from the risk of data loss.

One camera vendor told me, dismissively, that tapeless media should just be handled as part of an “IT workflow.” Which is great if you have an IT department and the budget to support it. But, I looked in my checkbook, and the ability to write a $100,000 check for an automated tape archive library is not possible this week.

For me, the long-term solution to archiving tapeless video is LTO-tape. This has the flexibility, storage, and longevity to meet all our archiving needs. But, while this seems obvious to me, manufacturers of LTO gear seem to be doing everything they can to avoid selling us the products we need.


Currently, most LTO-tape drives connect via FibreChannel, SAS, or mini-SAS. Which makes sense if you are selling to the corporate market, where every server supports plug-in cards, speed is everything, and budgets are always expressed in units of ten thousand dollars.

But that isn’t the reality of video editing.

More than 70% of all video editors work in companies of five employees or less. Generally, the video editor provides all their own tech support, without access to an IT department.

Additionally, I would guess that close to half of all video editing is done on a laptop with a FireWire-attached RAID or hard disk. Portability is more important to a producer shooting a documentary than sheer horsepower.

Or, take an independent filmmaker on a budget. They have a collection of multi-terabyte FireWire drives, containing all the elements of their film, scattered across their desktop while editing on an iMac to take advantage of the large screen. Saving money yet getting a large screen is more important than buying the fastest possible computer.

I don’t have any research here, but I would guess that two-thirds of video editors are working on a system that isn’t a MacPro. And every one of those editors is juggling terabytes of data and praying they can figure out a way to store it for the long-term.

NOTE: The newly announced Thunderbolt provides a very fast data bus that tape vendors can tap into that would give them access to every new Mac that Apple ships. However, it doesn’t solve the archiving problems of the millions of Mac users that already have gear.


When backing up corporate servers, speed is important, because many of the files on a server change daily.

But this isn’t typical for video. Video and film shoot a lot of files in a very short period of time, then spend a while — sometimes a long while — editing them. In other words, once the initial backup is complete, the only files that change are relatively small project files, not the massive media files.

This means that a workflow that features easy-to-connect and easy-to-use is far superior to one that emphasizes blinding speed. We are making archives here to last for decades. Taking an extra few hours to back everything up is a non-issue.

My large media files don’t change that often. My small project files change daily. And I only need to archive my project once – when the entire project is complete.

A FireWire-attached LTO drive would not be a speed demon, but I’d bet you’d never be able to keep it in stock. Security of my assets is FAR more important than raw transfer speed.


Here’s a specific example.

HP is a leading manufacturer of LTO drives. About a month ago, I contacted them for a loaner unit to review so that I could use it to illustrate a webinar I just did on how to archive Final Cut Pro projects.

HP agreed and shipped me an HP StorageWorks Ultrium 3000 SAS LTO-5 tape drive. It uses an ATTO ExpressSAS H680 interface card, which, because it is a plug-in PCIe card, only works with a MacPro.

The drive arrived a month ago and I am STILL trying to figure out how to connect it to my MacPro!

NOTE: Installation on Windows and Linux is close to click-one-button easy. Not so on the Mac

I teamed up with two software engineers to help me get this to work. The first took one look at the installation instructions and gave up.

The second spent many hours over the last four weeks trying to configure the system. Here’s what he learned:

  1. The HP unit didn’t come with firmware compatible with the software
  2. Updating the firmware is seriously non-trivial.
  3. It’s loud. At about two feet the sound measures about 57dB in operation.

Here is a BRIEF summary of the steps necessary to install the HP StorageWorks Ultrium 3000 SAS unit on a MacPro. (Keep in mind this required a Unix-trained hardware engineer to accomplish — this is only a summary, the actual installation process took more than 30 steps and two weeks of jiggering to figure out!)

1. Install the ATTO SAS card into PCIe slot #1 of the MacPro.

2. Go to Google and download MacFuse, which is special utility software that allows the drive to operate on a Mac)

3. Install MacFuse

4. Go to HP’s website — — to download the latest drive firmware. HINT: To get this to work, you need to know the version you need. To make this easier, HP doesn’t tell you which version that is.

5. Download and install ICUFramework.pkg

6. Download and install LinearTapeFileSystem.pkg

7. Format the tape cartridge – this is LOUD! 57 dB. HINT: Formatting a tape can only be done from the Terminal window. You ARE familiar with entering Unix commands via Terminal, aren’t you?)

8. Update Firmware on your drive. HINT: This involves a return to the Terminal.

9. Prior to installation move the downloaded firmware into the /VAR/ROOT/ folder. HINT: You will be glad to know that this folder is invisible on the Mac.

10. Make yourself a SuperUser in order to install the software. HINT: You should be familiar with how to enter the root.

And this is only the START! There are still about 20 steps left to go involving terminal commands, more downloads, accessing invisible folders, and, if I read the fine print correctly, sacrificing a small goat.

This is ridiculous!


Yes, there are existing Mac solutions out there.

The Tolis — has BRU Producer, a hardware/software system for archiving that runs on Mac, Windows, and Linux systems. I’ve spent the last 30 minutes on their website, I still have no idea what products I need or how they are priced. To purchase their product, I need to be referred to a dealer. When I go to a dealer’s site, for information or pricing, they refer me back to the Tolis Group site.

The Tolis Group has hardware bundles, software bundles, and add-ons, which, apparently, are neither hardware nor software, but assume you already have the hardware you need, whatever that is. — is another company that makes archiving solutions for the Mac. They only have two products, which makes deciding a lot simpler. However, nowhere on their website do they mention a price.

OK, that means I need to buy it from a dealer. So, I went to the websites of four of the dealers listed on Cache-A’s website:

  • AbleCineTech: Doesn’t list Cache-A in their vendor list, and Cache-A can’t be found using a search
  • Digital Video Group: Doesn’t list the products they sell and their site is not searchable
  • B & H Studios: Cache-A not listed, site not searchable
  • TekServe: Cache-A can’t be found using a search
  • And these are not small dealers here. It seems I can only buy Cache-A through dealers and the dealers are too embarrassed to mention they carry the product!

    Is selling archiving solutions REALLY that difficult??? Is this much secrecy about pricing, products, or service that necessary?

    Apparently, archiving IS rocket science!


    If you are a manufacturer with an LTO-tape-based archiving solution that:

    1. Can be installed easily on the Mac OS
    2. Is willing to list the product and its price on their website
    3. Has an announced shipping date
    4. Has an announced price of between $2,000 and $4,000
    5. Can connect to Macs via Thunderbolt or FireWire
    6. Supports the LTO-5 standard, which makes file backup/restore VERY easy
    7. And includes archiving software that can be run by mere mortals and not IT gods…

    Contact me. I will happily share the news of your product to the MILLIONS of video editors that are desperately searching for ways to safeguard their media.

    Otherwise, we run the very real possibility that every movie we are watching today will slowly disappear over the next few years as our current archive solutions fail.

    Bookmark the permalink.

    8 Responses to An Exercise In Frustration

    1. Jon says:

      Hi, Larry – what a great article. I first saw a reference in your book (…”Final Cut Pro X: Making the Transition”) to LTO and decided to look into a system that I could use with Thunderbolt (our laptops) and Firewire (my MacPro and IMacs). A little research shows the product is really only available in theory. (Your frustration in finding vendors and prices reminds me of my frustrating search for a high volume scanner that works with Mac – finally ended up with a Fujitsu running under Windows with Parallels and saving to the Mac file system…it works well, but with no help from any vendors.)

      Keep up the pressure – when the product described in your Conclusion is offered, I will buy it.



      • Dennis Dillon says:

        After spending some time looking into an LTO5 TB solution, i remain as you do.
        Chatted with Gary Adcock Studio 34, and he indicated end of year for a solution. I guess one can use ATTO /Promise adapters and move on, but it seem silly since TB has been out for some time.
        Dreaming of a single interface TB throughout capture, dailies, on set CC, and finally LTO5.

    2. Francisco Garcia says:

      Thanks for this!
      Despite your frustrations this helped me realized I’m not alone in finding a solution.
      Problem with our office is that we have mostly iMacs with Thunderbolt, but I think I found a solution that might work.
      Since the HP StorageWorks Ultrium 3000 SAS LTO-5 tape drive is 6Gb/s SAS it looks like I can use an ATTO ThunderLink SH 1068 controller which can take a 10 Gb/s Thunderbolt connections and provide a 6Gb/s SAS / SATA compatible (with proper cables) connection that should be able to link to the deck.
      MSRP for the ATTO ThunderLink is $895 and can be found here:

      I assume I’ll need to get BRU PE as well.

      I’m an admitted newbie to all this and the only time I touched a tape deck was 3 years ago when a producer had me back up R3D files for a feature to an AIT drive using Retrospect on a G5 tower. Oh the horror! 🙂

      I’m still waiting to hear back from ATTO about my queries. I’ll let you know what I find out.
      Of course, if you’ve already gone down this path I’d love to hear your opinion in it. Thanks!

      • We are just now trying to archive after 5 years in the video business (small 3 person co.). Why now? We get so frustrated, and keep pushing it off to the side. We have external HD’s all over the office. Most unpleasant to ones nervous system. So far we are thinking ICloud might do it? HAVEN’T A CLUE IF WE ARE ON THE RIGHT TRACK!

    3. William Brost says:

      Has anyone been able to get this to work successfully? I have the following setup:

      -iMac 13,2 running 10.8.2
      -HP StorageWorks Ultrium 3000 SAS
      -Sonnet with Ecco Express SE with ATTO ExpressSAS H680

      I can’t seem to get either HP StoreOpen or BRU PE to see the LTO drive. On the thunderbolt bus, I can confirm that the Echo Express and ATTO ExpressSAS are recognized, but neither software package sees the drive.

      Any tips?



    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Larry Recommends:

    FCPX Complete

    NEW & Updated!

    Edit smarter with Larry’s latest training, all available in our store.

    Access over 1,900 on-demand video editing courses. Become a member of our Video Training Library today!


    Subscribe to Larry's FREE weekly newsletter and save 10%
    on your first purchase.