Storage Predictions for 2025, From Larry O’Connor at OWC

Posted on by Larry

Last week, Larry O’Connor, Founder & CEO of OWC, made three predictions about storage for 2025.  His thoughts are interesting. Let me know what you think in the comments.

NOTE: Larry uses the term “on-prem” which means “on premises” or “located at your location.”


Prediction 1: The Return of On-Prem Data, Compute, and Backup to Improve Performance, Strengthen Security, and Control Costs

On-premises data storage and computing will become increasingly essential as companies prioritize security, performance, and financial control. With rising costs and growing vulnerabilities in the cloud, organizations and individual operators are increasingly moving back to on-prem solutions as the primary strategy for secure data management. Storing confidential data locally not only cuts costs and improves access speed but also greatly reduces the risk of exposure to large-scale breaches, making it a safer choice over public cloud options. Local data storage, especially in the case of smaller businesses, is a far less attractive target for cyber-attacks, offering a crucial security layer that cloud solutions cannot match. While the cloud can still play a role as an add-on or tertiary backup for external data sharing or less critical uses, on-prem data and computing are now the must-have strategy, with the cloud as a nice to have or specific use application in the mix.

The cost of cloud storage in particular has gone from nearly given away to becoming significantly expensive. The freebies that drew people in have been slowly but surely pulled away and with a growing cost to the storage. I have spoken to some in the service space that a decade ago got into the business of driving customers to cloud storage services who are now finding good business driving them back to on prem.

It’s not that these distributed storage providers do not offer value – but it’s all about the right services for the right need.

There’s no reason to depend on the cloud for all or even a majority of your data needs. It’s not cost-effective to do so vs. easy-to-deploy, faster, on-prem options. The cloud also requires and costs you bandwidth, and also time.

If your confidential data is on the cloud, you obviously have a greater risk of being part of a massive, large-scale breach… It’s less of a risk to use the cloud for external data sharing but not for corporate infrastructure. Keeping your data local, as a smaller target, is often more secure.

The cloud for backup really should be tertiary, in my humble opinion, whereas having a good backup strategy locally is going to be more cost-effective and give you much greater accessibility. If something goes down locally and you need to recover, it’s faster and more convenient if you do so locally, rather than having to pull it off the cloud.

Prediction 2: The Rise of On-Prem AI for Democratization and IP Protection

Bringing AI capabilities on-premises allows more businesses, especially smaller ones that may not have the budget for extensive cloud-based AI, to benefit from powerful data processing and analysis tools. Having AI on-site also plays a crucial role in protecting a company’s intellectual property (IP). When AI is run locally, sensitive and proprietary data – such as customer insights, unique algorithms, and business strategies – stays within the company’s secure environment, reducing the risk of exposure or leakage that can happen when data is sent to and processed in the cloud – i.e., avoiding data bleed where proprietary information could unintentionally enhance third-party models or be accessed intentionally by external entities.

On-prem AI will democratize some of the AI learning and capabilities that smaller businesses and institutions will have access to. AI in the cloud is already really expensive.

Having on-prem AI means that your data and IP gets to stay on-prem… There’s not one bit of risk that there’s any bleed-over from the datasets you provide for AI, ultimately helping other systems and potentially competitors learn and benefit from your private data and knowledge. You also have an ongoing benefit, not a forever cost expenditure.

Prediction 3: The Performance Gap Between Locally Operated Systems and Cloud-Dependent Solutions Will Continue to Expand

Higher-performance desktop storage and local networking is going to create a larger gap versus network-dependent data needs. For those that benefit from higher performance at their working location – for editing, ingest, backup, you name it – the advent of Thunderbolt 5 and continued improvements in Thunderbolt 3/4 40Gb/s capabilities on the latest crop and future Mac and PC/Windows systems means local data and interface capabilities have never been better.

When you are able to operate locally with interface speeds, on plug and play cabling or networking, at up to 7000MB/s vs. a typical at best of 100MB/s (1/70th the speed), suddenly you’re feeling even more so the drag of remote cloud dependency vs. what you can do internally and now externally on your system.

Complex data sets, high-resolution imagery, video – all of these things can be manipulated and processed more and more efficiently on a local level with the cloud being a good distribution vector for the final works versus the raw.

The sheer improvements of the last few years and the leapfrog/jump of this recently with Thunderbolt 5 gives all of us great options for how we get it done on-site and how we balance the benefits of cloud capabilities for share and distribution as needed. When it takes longer to upload and then download a large data set site to site versus duplicating to a fast drive and shipping it… and for a far lower cost…. It’s all about finding the best fit and using all the available technologies for the workflow a given user/company finds best for them.


Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Storage Predictions for 2025, From Larry O’Connor at OWC

  1. Chris North says:

    There do not seem to be many 3.5 inch external HDD drives around these days. I wonder if OWC and other manufacturers will get back to providing well engineered 3.5 inch drives at a reasonable cost? I have recently been looking to buy a reliable smallish (2TB) external backup drive for my 1TB laptop but most drives seem to have a significant failure rate. The only advice seems to be copy the back up to several drives (at least 3-2-1). Any recommendations for reliable back up drives which have a good ‘sustained’ data rate rather than an initial peak and then sharp drop?

    • Larry says:

      Chris:

      I don’t know where you are looking but 3.5″ HDDs are everywhere. They are in enclosures from Glyph, OWC, Seagate, and many others; as well as virtually every RAID on the market.

      Brands include Seagate, Western Digital and Toshiba. Take a look at B&H Photo for options.

      Larry

      • Mike Janowski says:

        For reliability statistics, I refer to Backblaze’s yearly list [here’s their Q3 2024 update: https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze-drive-stats-for-q3-2024/%5D.

        I purchase my drives for long-term “on prem” storage based on their findings, and have not hadca problem.

        As far as wherever purchase them? Where else? AMAZON!

      • Chris North says:

        I was looking for a stand alone ‘ready to go’ External drive for this. A better option would probably be to buy decent enclosures as you indicate and select the drives from the reliability figures reported by Blaze (although reliability of brands seems to vary over time). Thanks.

        • Larry says:

          Chris:

          There’s nothing wrong with stand-alone, ready-to-go. If something goes wrong, you only have one vendor to deal with. I bought drives separately because I’ve done this before and I know what I’m doing. BackBlaze is great, but most of their drives are smaller than the capacities I need. So, I read their tables, but don’t rely on them exclusively. And, no, I still don’t like Western Digital.

          Larry

  2. Thanks Larry for these insights from OWC. As they say, “What comes around, goes around.” For my small video business I never made the move to cloud storage and instead went with local HDD, SSD and LTO back-up. So for me, this is all good news. As always, your newsletter continues to be enlightening.

  3. Richard Wright says:

    Same as Seth. My son has been encouraging me to go with Cloud storage for years – but I have resisted, remembering some early crashes, my obstinance, and the slow speed to upload. I have a 60T OWC and a plethora of backups and now I find I am on the new wave! Great. And btw I love OWC and their excellent customer service.

    • Larry says:

      Richard:

      The cloud is great for collaboration, but for media storage, we are simply renting space – forever – without any control over who can actually access our media, nor what happens if the company owning the server decides to leave the business.

      The cloud is sexy, but local storage is safe…. assuming you keep backups.

      Larry

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything You Need to Know


2,000 Video Training Titles

  • Apple Final Cut Pro
  • Adobe Premiere Pro
  • DaVinci Resolve

Edit smarter with Larry Jordan. Available in our store.

Access over 2,000 on-demand video editing courses. Become a member of our Video Training Library today!


JOIN NOW

Subscribe to Larry's FREE weekly newsletter and
save 10%
on your first purchase.